Am I correct in thinking that MS Office contains only Outlook and not Outlook Express, which is a different programme? Later versions of Office don't contain both by any chance? B.W.
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
Outlook Express was included in XP and earlier Windows versions. Outlook is a part of Office and has nothing in common with Outlook Express except that part of its name. No versions of Office contains OE. All current versions of Office contain MS Outlook. Windows Live Mail is the successor to Outlook Express and runs on XP, Vista and Win7. Windows Live Mail (Overview, Features & Download) http://get.live.com/wlmail/overview -- Bruce Hagen MS-MVP [Mail] Imperial Beach, CA "B.W." <bw@nomail.Invalid.> wrote in message news:A74322F5-191B-485D-B3A4-63CD26E626FA@microsoft.com... > Am I correct in thinking that MS Office contains only Outlook and not > Outlook Express, which is a different programme? Later versions of > Office don't contain both by any chance? > > B.W.
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
Thank you Bruce, that's exactly what I understood. B.W. "Bruce Hagen" <BRH@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:hvou4g$6jf$1@news.eternal-september.org... > Outlook Express was included in XP and earlier Windows versions. Outlook > is a part of Office and has nothing in common with Outlook Express except > that part of its name. No versions of Office contains OE. All current > versions of Office contain MS Outlook. > > Windows Live Mail is the successor to Outlook Express and runs on XP, > Vista and Win7. > > Windows Live Mail (Overview, Features & Download) > http://get.live.com/wlmail/overview > -- > Bruce Hagen > MS-MVP [Mail] > Imperial Beach, CA > > > "B.W." <bw@nomail.Invalid.> wrote in message > news:A74322F5-191B-485D-B3A4-63CD26E626FA@microsoft.com... >> Am I correct in thinking that MS Office contains only Outlook and not >> Outlook Express, which is a different programme? Later versions of >> Office don't contain both by any chance? >> >> B.W. >
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
You're welcome. -- Bruce Hagen MS-MVP [Mail] Imperial Beach, CA "B.W." <bw@nomail.Invalid.> wrote in message news:BE47B337-D2B4-4D2C-BFA2-F831F721FE6F@microsoft.com... > Thank you Bruce, that's exactly what I understood. > > B.W. > > "Bruce Hagen" <BRH@nospam.invalid> wrote in message > news:hvou4g$6jf$1@news.eternal-september.org... >> Outlook Express was included in XP and earlier Windows versions. >> Outlook is a part of Office and has nothing in common with Outlook >> Express except that part of its name. No versions of Office contains >> OE. All current versions of Office contain MS Outlook. >> >> Windows Live Mail is the successor to Outlook Express and runs on XP, >> Vista and Win7. >> >> Windows Live Mail (Overview, Features & Download) >> http://get.live.com/wlmail/overview >> -- >> Bruce Hagen >> MS-MVP [Mail] >> Imperial Beach, CA >> >> >> "B.W." <bw@nomail.Invalid.> wrote in message >> news:A74322F5-191B-485D-B3A4-63CD26E626FA@microsoft.com... >>> Am I correct in thinking that MS Office contains only Outlook and not >>> Outlook Express, which is a different programme? Later versions of >>> Office don't contain both by any chance? >>> >>> B.W. >>
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
"B.W." <bw@nomail.Invalid.> wrote in message news:A74322F5-191B-485D-B3A4-63CD26E626FA@microsoft.com... > Am I correct in thinking that MS Office contains only Outlook and not > Outlook Express, which is a different programme? Yes. > Later versions of Office don't contain both by any chance? No. OE came with some earlier versions of IE (5.5 and above?). ISTR my W95a box didn't have OE until I installed an upgrade of IE. You can still get the latest version of OE by getting the latest available IE but you might not be able to run it well on some OSes.
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
From everything I have read online, Outlook Express is neither part of Windows 7 nor can it be run in Windows 7 - hence my original question Ron >> B.W. >> >> "Bruce Hagen" <BRH@nospam.invalid> wrote in message >> news:hvou4g$6jf$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>> Outlook Express was included in XP and earlier Windows versions. Outlook >>> is a part of Office and has nothing in common with Outlook Express >>> except that part of its name. No versions of Office contains OE. All >>> current versions of Office contain MS Outlook. >>> >>> Windows Live Mail is the successor to Outlook Express and runs on XP, >>> Vista and Win7. >>> >>> Windows Live Mail (Overview, Features & Download) >>> http://get.live.com/wlmail/overview >>> -- >>> Bruce Hagen >>> MS-MVP [Mail] >>> Imperial Beach, CA >>> >>> >>> "B.W." <bw@nomail.Invalid.> wrote in message >>> news:A74322F5-191B-485D-B3A4-63CD26E626FA@microsoft.com... >>>> Am I correct in thinking that MS Office contains only Outlook and not >>>> Outlook Express, which is a different programme? Later versions of >>>> Office don't contain both by any chance? >>>> >>>> B.W. >>> >
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
You replied to me. Did you mean to reply to the OP? You are correct about not running OE on Win7. You asked about transferring the messages from OE to WLMail. If the reply you received is not sufficient, please return to your thread and say so. -- Bruce Hagen MS-MVP [Mail] Imperial Beach, CA "Ron Patterson" <a.baba@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:aaSdnX6rl4Wspb3RnZ2dnUVZ_uqdnZ2d@earthlink.com... > From everything I have read online, Outlook Express is neither part of > Windows 7 nor can it be run in Windows 7 > - hence my original question > > Ron > > >>> B.W. >>> >>> "Bruce Hagen" <BRH@nospam.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:hvou4g$6jf$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>>> Outlook Express was included in XP and earlier Windows versions. >>>> Outlook >>>> is a part of Office and has nothing in common with Outlook Express >>>> except that part of its name. No versions of Office contains OE. All >>>> current versions of Office contain MS Outlook. >>>> >>>> Windows Live Mail is the successor to Outlook Express and runs on XP, >>>> Vista and Win7. >>>> >>>> Windows Live Mail (Overview, Features & Download) >>>> http://get.live.com/wlmail/overview >>>> -- >>>> Bruce Hagen >>>> MS-MVP [Mail] >>>> Imperial Beach, CA >>>> >>>> >>>> "B.W." <bw@nomail.Invalid.> wrote in message >>>> news:A74322F5-191B-485D-B3A4-63CD26E626FA@microsoft.com... >>>>> Am I correct in thinking that MS Office contains only Outlook and >>>>> not >>>>> Outlook Express, which is a different programme? Later versions of >>>>> Office don't contain both by any chance? >>>>> >>>>> B.W. >>>> >> > > >
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
Ron Patterson wrote: > From everything I have read online, Outlook Express is neither part of > Windows 7 nor can it be run in Windows 7 > - hence my original question Which you did not ask in this thread but which I did answer; cf. http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.outlookexpress.general/browse_frm/thread/5a115bcac180fec3
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
News to me that you can get OE in IE8... DAS To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' -- "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message news:%23ZnavsaELHA.5668@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... [...] > still get the latest version of OE by getting the latest available IE but > you might not be able to run it well on some OSes. >
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
Anything is news to you, HoopleHead. "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message news:1N2dnXmIlaYdLr3RnZ2dnUVZ7sKdnZ2d@pipex.net... : News to me that you can get OE in IE8... : : DAS : : To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' : -- : "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message : news:%23ZnavsaELHA.5668@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... : [...] : > still get the latest version of OE by getting the latest available IE but : > you might not be able to run it well on some OSes. : > : :
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
Bruce Office Home and Student 2003 2007 and 2010 does not come with Outlook. This is the only version that does not contain Outlook -- Peter Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged. http://www.microsoft.com/protect "Bruce Hagen" <BRH@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:hvou4g$6jf$1@news.eternal-september.org... > Outlook Express was included in XP and earlier Windows versions. Outlook is a part > of Office and has nothing in common with Outlook Express except that part of its > name. No versions of Office contains OE. All current versions of Office contain MS > Outlook. > > Windows Live Mail is the successor to Outlook Express and runs on XP, Vista and > Win7. > > Windows Live Mail (Overview, Features & Download) > http://get.live.com/wlmail/overview > -- > Bruce Hagen > MS-MVP [Mail] > Imperial Beach, CA > > > "B.W." <bw@nomail.Invalid.> wrote in message > news:A74322F5-191B-485D-B3A4-63CD26E626FA@microsoft.com... >> Am I correct in thinking that MS Office contains only Outlook and not Outlook >> Express, which is a different programme? Later versions of Office don't contain >> both by any chance? >> >> B.W. >
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:35:19 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote: > "B.W." <bw@nomail.Invalid.> wrote in message > news:A74322F5-191B-485D-B3A4-63CD26E626FA@microsoft.com... >> Am I correct in thinking that MS Office contains only Outlook and not >> Outlook Express, which is a different programme? > Yes. >> Later versions of Office don't contain both by any chance? > No. OE came with some earlier versions of IE (5.5 and above?) ... IE 5.5 and IE 6.0, but not IE 7 and later. -- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
Ooops. I edited out all the Win98/me parts without checking to see how it affected the rest of my post. Should have been: "...latest version of OE in the latest available IE for Win98/me." Bruce covered the rest of the IE versions in his post. Thanks, DAS ....and in case I don't see some regulars from this group again, It's been a great experience reading here. Special thanks to Bruce Hagen, I still have the same issue I came here with, but at least I know *why* and how to fix it now. :o) "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message news:1N2dnXmIlaYdLr3RnZ2dnUVZ7sKdnZ2d@pipex.net... > News to me that you can get OE in IE8... > > DAS > > To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' > -- > "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message > news:%23ZnavsaELHA.5668@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > [...] >> still get the latest version of OE by getting the latest available IE >> but you might not be able to run it well on some OSes. >> > >
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
"N. Miller" <anonymous@msnews.aosake.net> wrote in message news:1s7hu33ovtf0l.dlg@msnews.aosake.net... > On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:35:19 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote: > >> "B.W." <bw@nomail.Invalid.> wrote in message >> news:A74322F5-191B-485D-B3A4-63CD26E626FA@microsoft.com... > >>> Am I correct in thinking that MS Office contains only Outlook and >>> not >>> Outlook Express, which is a different programme? > >> Yes. > >>> Later versions of Office don't contain both by any chance? > >> No. OE came with some earlier versions of IE (5.5 and above?) ... > > IE 5.5 and IE 6.0, but not IE 7 and later. Did W95a come with IE4 and 'Windows Mail' and 'Exchange' but no OE? memory fades...
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
"FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message news:OBLb4tkELHA.588@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > "N. Miller" <anonymous@msnews.aosake.net> wrote in message > news:1s7hu33ovtf0l.dlg@msnews.aosake.net... >> On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:35:19 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote: >> >>> "B.W." <bw@nomail.Invalid.> wrote in message >>> news:A74322F5-191B-485D-B3A4-63CD26E626FA@microsoft.com... >> >>>> Am I correct in thinking that MS Office contains only Outlook and not >>>> Outlook Express, which is a different programme? >> >>> Yes. >> >>>> Later versions of Office don't contain both by any chance? >> >>> No. OE came with some earlier versions of IE (5.5 and above?) ... >> >> IE 5.5 and IE 6.0, but not IE 7 and later. > > Did W95a come with IE4 and 'Windows Mail' and 'Exchange' but no OE? > > memory fades... Microsoft Mail and Intertnet News preceded OE in Win95. (Ergo, msimn) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outlook_Express
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
You're not gonna join the fun in Microsoft Answers, FTR? -- Bruce Hagen MS-MVP [Mail] Imperial Beach, CA "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message news:%23ODdirkELHA.1316@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Ooops. > > I edited out all the Win98/me parts without checking to see how it > affected the rest of my post. > > Should have been: > > "...latest version of OE in the latest available IE for Win98/me." > > Bruce covered the rest of the IE versions in his post. > > Thanks, DAS > > ...and in case I don't see some regulars from this group again, It's > been a great experience reading here. Special thanks to Bruce Hagen, I > still have the same issue I came here with, but at least I know *why* > and how to fix it now. :o) > > "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message > news:1N2dnXmIlaYdLr3RnZ2dnUVZ7sKdnZ2d@pipex.net... >> News to me that you can get OE in IE8... >> >> DAS >> >> To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' >> -- >> "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message >> news:%23ZnavsaELHA.5668@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> [...] >>> still get the latest version of OE by getting the latest available IE >>> but you might not be able to run it well on some OSes. >>> >> >> > >
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
Probably not, I'm more the unmoderated usenet group type. :o) "Bruce Hagen" <BRH@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:hvr7v4$rdu$1@news.eternal-september.org... > You're not gonna join the fun in Microsoft Answers, FTR? > -- > Bruce Hagen > MS-MVP [Mail] > Imperial Beach, CA > > > "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message > news:%23ODdirkELHA.1316@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> Ooops. >> >> I edited out all the Win98/me parts without checking to see how it >> affected the rest of my post. >> >> Should have been: >> >> "...latest version of OE in the latest available IE for Win98/me." >> >> Bruce covered the rest of the IE versions in his post. >> >> Thanks, DAS >> >> ...and in case I don't see some regulars from this group again, It's >> been a great experience reading here. Special thanks to Bruce Hagen, >> I still have the same issue I came here with, but at least I know >> *why* and how to fix it now. :o) >> >> "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message >> news:1N2dnXmIlaYdLr3RnZ2dnUVZ7sKdnZ2d@pipex.net... >>> News to me that you can get OE in IE8... >>> >>> DAS >>> >>> To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' >>> -- >>> "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message >>> news:%23ZnavsaELHA.5668@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>> [...] >>>> still get the latest version of OE by getting the latest available >>>> IE but you might not be able to run it well on some OSes. >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
"Bruce Hagen" <BRH@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:hvr7ro$r4d$1@news.eternal-september.org... > > "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message > news:OBLb4tkELHA.588@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> "N. Miller" <anonymous@msnews.aosake.net> wrote in message >> news:1s7hu33ovtf0l.dlg@msnews.aosake.net... >>> On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:35:19 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote: >>> >>>> "B.W." <bw@nomail.Invalid.> wrote in message >>>> news:A74322F5-191B-485D-B3A4-63CD26E626FA@microsoft.com... >>> >>>>> Am I correct in thinking that MS Office contains only Outlook and >>>>> not >>>>> Outlook Express, which is a different programme? >>> >>>> Yes. >>> >>>>> Later versions of Office don't contain both by any chance? >>> >>>> No. OE came with some earlier versions of IE (5.5 and above?) ... >>> >>> IE 5.5 and IE 6.0, but not IE 7 and later. >> >> Did W95a come with IE4 and 'Windows Mail' and 'Exchange' but no OE? >> >> memory fades... > > > Microsoft Mail and Intertnet News preceded OE in Win95. (Ergo, msimn) > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outlook_Express Ah, yes. "Microsoft" Mail. Thanks, Bruce.
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
OE came with IE versions 4 through 6. It's predecessor Internet Mail and News (IMN) came with IE3. But you could get versions IE without OE or IMN. That caused a number of problems. People would update IE without including OE and their older version of OE would malfunction. -- Mike - http://TechHelp.Santovec.us "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message news:OBLb4tkELHA.588@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > "N. Miller" <anonymous@msnews.aosake.net> wrote in message > news:1s7hu33ovtf0l.dlg@msnews.aosake.net... >> On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:35:19 -0400, FromTheRafters wrote: >> >>> "B.W." <bw@nomail.Invalid.> wrote in message >>> news:A74322F5-191B-485D-B3A4-63CD26E626FA@microsoft.com... >> >>>> Am I correct in thinking that MS Office contains only Outlook and >>>> not >>>> Outlook Express, which is a different programme? >> >>> Yes. >> >>>> Later versions of Office don't contain both by any chance? >> >>> No. OE came with some earlier versions of IE (5.5 and above?) ... >> >> IE 5.5 and IE 6.0, but not IE 7 and later. > > Did W95a come with IE4 and 'Windows Mail' and 'Exchange' but no OE? > > memory fades... >
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
"Michael Santovec" <michael@santovec.XXX> wrote in message news:eD1cthoELHA.4816@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > OE came with IE versions 4 through 6. > > It's predecessor Internet Mail and News (IMN) came with IE3. Thanks, Michael, that must be the one I was thinking of. So, the earliest version of Windows to have OE on the installation disc would be W95b? Win95a IIRC had IE and on the first run (webpage?) suggested an upgrade. Perhaps only because of when I did it, IE 5 was the first version 'in my experience' to have OE. > But you could get versions IE without OE or IMN. That caused a number > of problems. People would update IE without including OE and their > older version of OE would malfunction. That's a bummer, like having vulnerable Java versions lying around because it wasn't *all* updated. It makes sense to me to have a certain amout of integration in programs with so many similar functions, It makes me wonder about the decision to not include an e-mail client in Win7 or IE8. Perhaps the OS now provides for more of the common needs and integration is less necessary.
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
For a variety of reasons, Microsoft's current free mail client (Windows Live Mail - WLM) was moved from being part of IE) to the Windows Live (WL) product line. Part of that is integration. WLM shares contacts with Messenger, Photo e-mail integration, Hotmail integration, etc. Part of that is revenue. OE never had a revenue source. WL has ad revenue. As far as being included with Win7, Microsoft's stated reason is that WL is on a different and more frequent development cycle than Windows. But no doubt, a consideration is Microsoft constantly being sued for Windows having too much functionality. Making WL a separate download avoids that hassle. One thing the WL installer does do is forced updates across the product line. The user can choose to install any or all components of the Windows Live Essentials. But when you go to update any one component, you are forced to update all installed components at the same time. That avoids some compatibility issues. But like OE, WLM is still dependent on IE for some services (e.g. HTML rendering and Printing) and updates to IE can have an adverse effect on WLM. -- Mike - http://TechHelp.Santovec.us "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message news:uzDQmysELHA.5500@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > "Michael Santovec" <michael@santovec.XXX> wrote in message > news:eD1cthoELHA.4816@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > >> OE came with IE versions 4 through 6. >> >> It's predecessor Internet Mail and News (IMN) came with IE3. > > Thanks, Michael, that must be the one I was thinking of. So, the > earliest version of Windows to have OE on the installation disc would > be W95b? Win95a IIRC had IE and on the first run (webpage?) suggested > an upgrade. Perhaps only because of when I did it, IE 5 was the first > version 'in my experience' to have OE. > >> But you could get versions IE without OE or IMN. That caused a >> number of problems. People would update IE without including OE and >> their older version of OE would malfunction. > > That's a bummer, like having vulnerable Java versions lying around > because it wasn't *all* updated. > > It makes sense to me to have a certain amout of integration in > programs with so many similar functions, It makes me wonder about the > decision to not include an e-mail client in Win7 or IE8. Perhaps the > OS now provides for more of the common needs and integration is less > necessary. > > >
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
Mr BS again. Your initials sum up your dribblings. DAS To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' -- "Bickford Shmeckler" <Bickford@Shmeckler.invalid> wrote in message news:hvqg1i$rng$1@news.eternal-september.org... > Anything is news to you, HoopleHead. > "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message > news:1N2dnXmIlaYdLr3RnZ2dnUVZ7sKdnZ2d@pipex.net... > : News to me that you can get OE in IE8... > : > : DAS > : > : To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' > : -- > : "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message > : news:%23ZnavsaELHA.5668@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > : [...] > : > still get the latest version of OE by getting the latest available IE > but > : > you might not be able to run it well on some OSes. > : > > : > : > >
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
Were you actually born a HoopleHead, or did you have to lower yourself to achieve the goal? "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message news:Gd2dnZL0KsGi9b7RnZ2dnUVZ8gSdnZ2d@pipex.net... : Mr BS again. Your initials sum up your dribblings. : : DAS : : To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' : -- : "Bickford Shmeckler" <Bickford@Shmeckler.invalid> wrote in message : news:hvqg1i$rng$1@news.eternal-september.org... : > Anything is news to you, HoopleHead. : > "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message : > news:1N2dnXmIlaYdLr3RnZ2dnUVZ7sKdnZ2d@pipex.net... : > : News to me that you can get OE in IE8... : > : : > : DAS : > : : > : To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' : > : -- : > : "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message : > : news:%23ZnavsaELHA.5668@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... : > : [...] : > : > still get the latest version of OE by getting the latest available IE : > but : > : > you might not be able to run it well on some OSes. : > : > : > : : > : : > : > : :
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
Changing the sender's name does not disguide the fact that you have yery limited vocab. But the name yet again fits: moron.... I don't think you can get beyond about 30 words, none of which is original, including 'your' "Hooplehead", purloined from a TV show. DAS To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' -- "Moron van der Loon" <moron@vdl.invalid> wrote in message news:hvvqj9$fvd$1@news.eternal-september.org... > Were you actually born a HoopleHead, or did you have to lower yourself to > achieve the goal? > > "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message > news:Gd2dnZL0KsGi9b7RnZ2dnUVZ8gSdnZ2d@pipex.net... > : Mr BS again. Your initials sum up your dribblings. > : > : DAS > : > : To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' > : -- > : "Bickford Shmeckler" <Bickford@Shmeckler.invalid> wrote in message > : news:hvqg1i$rng$1@news.eternal-september.org... > : > Anything is news to you, HoopleHead. > : > "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message > : > news:1N2dnXmIlaYdLr3RnZ2dnUVZ7sKdnZ2d@pipex.net... > : > : News to me that you can get OE in IE8... > : > : > : > : DAS > : > : > : > : To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' > : > : -- > : > : "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message > : > : news:%23ZnavsaELHA.5668@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > : > : [...] > : > : > still get the latest version of OE by getting the latest available > IE > : > but > : > : > you might not be able to run it well on some OSes. > : > : > > : > : > : > : > : > > : > > : > : > >
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
Now you are the King of the hoopleheads. Distinguished award -- Peter Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged. http://www.microsoft.com/protect "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message news:rvSdnWCRybE5Mb7RnZ2dnUVZ8tSdnZ2d@pipex.net... > Changing the sender's name does not disguide the fact that you have yery limited > vocab. But the name yet again fits: moron.... > > I don't think you can get beyond about 30 words, none of which is original, > including 'your' "Hooplehead", purloined from a TV show. > > DAS > > To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' > -- > "Moron van der Loon" <moron@vdl.invalid> wrote in message > news:hvvqj9$fvd$1@news.eternal-september.org... >> Were you actually born a HoopleHead, or did you have to lower yourself to >> achieve the goal? >> >> "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message >> news:Gd2dnZL0KsGi9b7RnZ2dnUVZ8gSdnZ2d@pipex.net... >> : Mr BS again. Your initials sum up your dribblings. >> : >> : DAS >> : >> : To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' >> : -- >> : "Bickford Shmeckler" <Bickford@Shmeckler.invalid> wrote in message >> : news:hvqg1i$rng$1@news.eternal-september.org... >> : > Anything is news to you, HoopleHead. >> : > "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message >> : > news:1N2dnXmIlaYdLr3RnZ2dnUVZ7sKdnZ2d@pipex.net... >> : > : News to me that you can get OE in IE8... >> : > : >> : > : DAS >> : > : >> : > : To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' >> : > : -- >> : > : "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message >> : > : news:%23ZnavsaELHA.5668@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> : > : [...] >> : > : > still get the latest version of OE by getting the latest available >> IE >> : > but >> : > : > you might not be able to run it well on some OSes. >> : > : > >> : > : >> : > : >> : > >> : > >> : >> : >> >> > >
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
6 days & counting... Peter Foldes wrote: > Now you are the King of the hoopleheads. Distinguished award > > > "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message > news:rvSdnWCRybE5Mb7RnZ2dnUVZ8tSdnZ2d@pipex.net... >> Changing the sender's name does not disguide the fact that you have yery >> limited vocab. But the name yet again fits: moron.... >> >> I don't think you can get beyond about 30 words, none of which is >> original, >> including 'your' "Hooplehead", purloined from a TV show. >> >> DAS >> >> To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' >> -- >> "Moron van der Loon" <moron@vdl.invalid> wrote in message >> news:hvvqj9$fvd$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>> Were you actually born a HoopleHead, or did you have to lower yourself >>> to >>> achieve the goal? >>> >>> "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message >>> news:Gd2dnZL0KsGi9b7RnZ2dnUVZ8gSdnZ2d@pipex.net... >>>> Mr BS again. Your initials sum up your dribblings. >>>> >>>> DAS >>>> >>>> To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' >>>> -- >>>> "Bickford Shmeckler" <Bickford@Shmeckler.invalid> wrote in message >>>> news:hvqg1i$rng$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>> Anything is news to you, HoopleHead. >>>>> "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message >>>>> news:1N2dnXmIlaYdLr3RnZ2dnUVZ7sKdnZ2d@pipex.net... >>>>>> News to me that you can get OE in IE8... >>>>>> >>>>>> DAS >>>>>> >>>>>> To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' >>>>>> -- >>>>>> "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message >>>>>> news:%23ZnavsaELHA.5668@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>>>>> [...] >>>>>>> still get the latest version of OE by getting the latest available >>>>>>> IE >>>>>>> but you might not be able to run it well on some OSes.
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
:-) :-0 For this time I am proud to hold the "King of the hoopleheads. Distinguished award".... DAS To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' -- "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message news:uq9%23OjDFLHA.5472@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >6 days & counting... > > Peter Foldes wrote: >> Now you are the King of the hoopleheads. Distinguished award >> >> >> "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message >> news:rvSdnWCRybE5Mb7RnZ2dnUVZ8tSdnZ2d@pipex.net... >>> Changing the sender's name does not disguide the fact that you have yery >>> limited vocab. But the name yet again fits: moron.... >>> >>> I don't think you can get beyond about 30 words, none of which is >>> original, >>> including 'your' "Hooplehead", purloined from a TV show. >>> >>> DAS >>> >>> To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' >>> -- >>> "Moron van der Loon" <moron@vdl.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:hvvqj9$fvd$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>>> Were you actually born a HoopleHead, or did you have to lower yourself >>>> to >>>> achieve the goal? >>>> >>>> "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message >>>> news:Gd2dnZL0KsGi9b7RnZ2dnUVZ8gSdnZ2d@pipex.net... >>>>> Mr BS again. Your initials sum up your dribblings. >>>>> >>>>> DAS >>>>> >>>>> To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' >>>>> -- >>>>> "Bickford Shmeckler" <Bickford@Shmeckler.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:hvqg1i$rng$1@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>>> Anything is news to you, HoopleHead. >>>>>> "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message >>>>>> news:1N2dnXmIlaYdLr3RnZ2dnUVZ7sKdnZ2d@pipex.net... >>>>>>> News to me that you can get OE in IE8... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DAS >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:%23ZnavsaELHA.5668@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>>> still get the latest version of OE by getting the latest available >>>>>>>> IE >>>>>>>> but you might not be able to run it well on some OSes. >
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
Excellent. You deserve it. Since you know what a HoopleHead is, you finally admit to your idiocrity. "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message news:R9idnXVcn84sSrnRnZ2dnUVZ8sGdnZ2d@pipex.net... : :-) :-0 : : For this time I am proud to hold the "King of the hoopleheads. Distinguished : award".... : : DAS : : To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' : -- : "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message : news:uq9%23OjDFLHA.5472@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... : >6 days & counting... : > : > Peter Foldes wrote: : >> Now you are the King of the hoopleheads. Distinguished award : >> : >> : >> "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message : >> news:rvSdnWCRybE5Mb7RnZ2dnUVZ8tSdnZ2d@pipex.net... : >>> Changing the sender's name does not disguide the fact that you have yery : >>> limited vocab. But the name yet again fits: moron.... : >>> : >>> I don't think you can get beyond about 30 words, none of which is : >>> original, : >>> including 'your' "Hooplehead", purloined from a TV show. : >>> : >>> DAS : >>> : >>> To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' : >>> -- : >>> "Moron van der Loon" <moron@vdl.invalid> wrote in message : >>> news:hvvqj9$fvd$1@news.eternal-september.org... : >>>> Were you actually born a HoopleHead, or did you have to lower yourself : >>>> to : >>>> achieve the goal? : >>>> : >>>> "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message : >>>> news:Gd2dnZL0KsGi9b7RnZ2dnUVZ8gSdnZ2d@pipex.net... : >>>>> Mr BS again. Your initials sum up your dribblings. : >>>>> : >>>>> DAS : >>>>> : >>>>> To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' : >>>>> -- : >>>>> "Bickford Shmeckler" <Bickford@Shmeckler.invalid> wrote in message : >>>>> news:hvqg1i$rng$1@news.eternal-september.org... : >>>>>> Anything is news to you, HoopleHead. : >>>>>> "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message : >>>>>> news:1N2dnXmIlaYdLr3RnZ2dnUVZ7sKdnZ2d@pipex.net... : >>>>>>> News to me that you can get OE in IE8... : >>>>>>> : >>>>>>> DAS : >>>>>>> : >>>>>>> To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' : >>>>>>> -- : >>>>>>> "FromTheRafters" <erratic @nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message : >>>>>>> news:%23ZnavsaELHA.5668@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... : >>>>>>> [...] : >>>>>>>> still get the latest version of OE by getting the latest available : >>>>>>>> IE : >>>>>>>> but you might not be able to run it well on some OSes. : > : :
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
<tick-tick-tick> 4 days & counting... On Jun 25, 3:26=A0am, PA Bear wrote: > 6 days & counting...
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
Then, the hoopleheads will mostly disappear. "PA Bear, MS MVP" <pabearmvp@gmail.com> wrote in message news:8954e100-4555-4c4e-9b75-135fb8f1dda5@i28g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... <tick-tick-tick> 4 days & counting... On Jun 25, 3:26 am, PA Bear wrote: > 6 days & counting...
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
Starting with you, perhaps. DAS To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' -- "Yuri Nalysis" <yuri@nalysis.invalid> wrote in message news:i0a546$4hk$1@news.eternal-september.org... > Then, the hoopleheads will mostly disappear. > > "PA Bear, MS MVP" <pabearmvp@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:8954e100-4555-4c4e-9b75-135fb8f1dda5@i28g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... > <tick-tick-tick> 4 days & counting... > > On Jun 25, 3:26 am, PA Bear wrote: >> 6 days & counting... > >
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
Oh, no. I'll always be around. "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message news:AuSdncnVvIy_WrXRnZ2dnUVZ8rmdnZ2d@pipex.net... : Starting with you, perhaps. : : DAS : : To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' : -- : "Yuri Nalysis" <yuri@nalysis.invalid> wrote in message : news:i0a546$4hk$1@news.eternal-september.org... : > Then, the hoopleheads will mostly disappear. : > : > "PA Bear, MS MVP" <pabearmvp@gmail.com> wrote in message : > news:8954e100-4555-4c4e-9b75-135fb8f1dda5@i28g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... : > <tick-tick-tick> 4 days & counting... : > : > On Jun 25, 3:26 am, PA Bear wrote: : >> 6 days & counting... : > : > : :
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
ITHM he will be making the shift to web-based hoopleheads. IOW *he* will no longer be *here* with *us*. "DAS" <nobody@spam.co.uk> wrote in message news:AuSdncnVvIy_WrXRnZ2dnUVZ8rmdnZ2d@pipex.net... > Starting with you, perhaps. > > DAS > > To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling' > -- > "Yuri Nalysis" <yuri@nalysis.invalid> wrote in message > news:i0a546$4hk$1@news.eternal-september.org... >> Then, the hoopleheads will mostly disappear. >> >> "PA Bear, MS MVP" <pabearmvp@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:8954e100-4555-4c4e-9b75-135fb8f1dda5@i28g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... >> <tick-tick-tick> 4 days & counting... >> >> On Jun 25, 3:26 am, PA Bear wrote: >>> 6 days & counting... >> >> > >
![]() |
0 |
![]() |