I'm getting the following error on some client workstations as I try to 
connect their local Outlook 2003 to a new Exchange 2007 server.
"Outlook could not logon.  Check to make sure you are connected to the 
network and are using the proper server and mailbox name."
Um, ok..I've checked names and it's all good.  Can ping the Exchange server 
and can even connect to it with Outlook 2003 from a different workstation. 
We are in the process of migrating from Groupwise 7 to Exchange, so there is 
the GW 7.0.1 client installed on the same workstation.  What we've done so 
far is to goto Control Panel/Mail and delete the Groupwise profile then it 
creates a new one when we start Outlook.I've read stuff about the TCP/IP 
stack being bad, so I've reset it, blown away IP and re-installed but 
nothing works.  Can anyone shed some light on this?

Bill

Found a fix on my own.  Turns out that the "Microsoft Exchange System 
Attendant" was hung or didnt' start correctly.  Once I restarted that 
service then the Outlook client connected just fine on that particular 
workstation.

Bill
"Bill Clark" <billc@no-email.com> wrote in message 
news:Obc$5sIbKHA.808@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> I'm getting the following error on some client workstations as I try to 
> connect their local Outlook 2003 to a new Exchange 2007 server.
> "Outlook could not logon.  Check to make sure you are connected to the 
> network and are using the proper server and mailbox name."
> Um, ok..I've checked names and it's all good.  Can ping the Exchange 
> server and can even connect to it with Outlook 2003 from a different 
> workstation. We are in the process of migrating from Groupwise 7 to 
> Exchange, so there is the GW 7.0.1 client installed on the same 
> workstation.  What we've done so far is to goto Control Panel/Mail and 
> delete the Groupwise profile then it creates a new one when we start 
> Outlook.I've read stuff about the TCP/IP stack being bad, so I've reset 
> it, blown away IP and re-installed but nothing works.  Can anyone shed 
> some light on this?
>
> Bill
>
>