OT - need standalone email client

  • Follow


I now this is slightly OT, but I am already using Outlook at work and home 
for my personal email. I need a standalone email app that I can use to check 
email from my laptop at home that I can use as dedicated for my work email. 
I see lots out there, including the old standby, Pegasus, any suggestions? 
TIA

-- 
marx404
<all gmail posts blocked> 


0
Reply marx404 12/8/2009 6:51:43 PM

Thunderbird.

"marx404" <404@404.com> wrote in message 
news:hfm77q$gm$1@news.eternal-september.org...
:I now this is slightly OT, but I am already using Outlook at work and home
: for my personal email. I need a standalone email app that I can use to 
check
: email from my laptop at home that I can use as dedicated for my work 
email.
: I see lots out there, including the old standby, Pegasus, any suggestions?
: TIA
:
: -- 
: marx404
: <all gmail posts blocked>
:
: 


0
Reply Tom 12/8/2009 7:03:51 PM


What type of mail account do you use at work? Why not make a profile in 
outlook for the work account instead of adding a new client?

-- 
Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/
Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com/

Outlook Tips by email:
mailto:dailytips-subscribe-request@lists.outlooktips.net

EMO - a weekly newsletter about Outlook and Exchange:
mailto:EMO-NEWSLETTER-SUBSCRIBE-REQUEST@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Poll: What version of Outlook do you use?
http://forums.slipstick.com/showthread.php?t=27072


"marx404" <404@404.com> wrote in message 
news:hfm77q$gm$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> I now this is slightly OT, but I am already using Outlook at work and home 
> for my personal email. I need a standalone email app that I can use to 
> check email from my laptop at home that I can use as dedicated for my work 
> email. I see lots out there, including the old standby, Pegasus, any 
> suggestions? TIA
>
> -- 
> marx404
> <all gmail posts blocked>
> 
0
Reply Diane 12/8/2009 9:46:29 PM

2 Replies
158 Views

(page loaded in 0.054 seconds)


Reply: