A friend just bought a MacBook Air and he needs to view a couple of Access
DBs on the Mac.
He doesn't need to manipulate the DBs just view it. What is the preferred
method to view an Access DB on a Mac?
Thanks,
Tom
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Tom
|
3/20/2008 3:07:26 AM |
|
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:07:26 GMT, "Tom" <yahoo@earthlink.com> wrote:
Open the file in McNotepad? Just kidding.
Access only runs on Windows, but fortunately you can run Windows on a
Mac. If you set him up with the runtime, he doesn't even need to shell
out money for MsAccess.
-Tom.
>A friend just bought a MacBook Air and he needs to view a couple of Access
>DBs on the Mac.
>He doesn't need to manipulate the DBs just view it. What is the preferred
>method to view an Access DB on a Mac?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Tom
>
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Tom
|
3/20/2008 4:37:28 AM
|
|
"Tom van Stiphout" <no.spam.tom7744@cox.net> wrote in message
news:7dq3u31jj9foduh3h0lijv94ukjltgl316@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:07:26 GMT, "Tom" <yahoo@earthlink.com> wrote:
>
> Open the file in McNotepad? Just kidding.
> Access only runs on Windows, but fortunately you can run Windows on a
> Mac. If you set him up with the runtime, he doesn't even need to shell
> out money for MsAccess.
>
> -Tom.
He doesn't want Windows the MacBook Air at all. Can he install a Mac
version of Access runtime?
Mike
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Tom
|
3/20/2008 11:31:53 AM
|
|
"Tom" <yahoo@earthlink.com> wrote in message
news:JWrEj.5989$sw3.4214@trnddc06...
>
> "Tom van Stiphout" <no.spam.tom7744@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:7dq3u31jj9foduh3h0lijv94ukjltgl316@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:07:26 GMT, "Tom" <yahoo@earthlink.com> wrote:
>>
>> Open the file in McNotepad? Just kidding.
>> Access only runs on Windows, but fortunately you can run Windows on a
>> Mac. If you set him up with the runtime, he doesn't even need to shell
>> out money for MsAccess.
>
> He doesn't want Windows the MacBook Air at all. Can he install a Mac
> version of Access runtime?
No. There's no such thing. Access only runs under Windows. The runtime
version of Access is the same executable as the full-blown version: it's
just that much of its functionality has been turned off through the
inclusion of literally hundreds of registry entries.
--
Doug Steele, Microsoft Access MVP
http://I.Am/DougSteele
(no e-mails, please!)
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Douglas
|
3/20/2008 12:15:27 PM
|
|
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:31:53 GMT, "Tom" <yahoo@earthlink.com> wrote:
There was an Access version for the Mac, but that was YEARS ago before
MSFT figured out the market segment for Macs.
-Tom.
>
>"Tom van Stiphout" <no.spam.tom7744@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:7dq3u31jj9foduh3h0lijv94ukjltgl316@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:07:26 GMT, "Tom" <yahoo@earthlink.com> wrote:
>>
>> Open the file in McNotepad? Just kidding.
>> Access only runs on Windows, but fortunately you can run Windows on a
>> Mac. If you set him up with the runtime, he doesn't even need to shell
>> out money for MsAccess.
>>
>> -Tom.
>He doesn't want Windows the MacBook Air at all. Can he install a Mac
>version of Access runtime?
>
>Mike
>
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Tom
|
3/20/2008 2:20:15 PM
|
|
"Tom van Stiphout" <no.spam.tom7744@cox.net> wrote in message
news:cjs4u31rosu5l30aht786vpmqb7e6640nt@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:31:53 GMT, "Tom" <yahoo@earthlink.com> wrote:
>
> There was an Access version for the Mac, but that was YEARS ago before
> MSFT figured out the market segment for Macs.
>
> -Tom.
Hmm, this is pretty grim.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Tom
|
3/21/2008 2:40:31 AM
|
|
I think that Filemaker may be able to get at an Access database. Exell for
Mac can run queries on Access if you install an ODBC driver (Available from
Access Technologies
..
On 3/20/08 7:40 PM, in article zeFEj.4384$jw2.3487@trndny04, "Tom"
<yahoo@earthlink.com> wrote:
>
> "Tom van Stiphout" <no.spam.tom7744@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:cjs4u31rosu5l30aht786vpmqb7e6640nt@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:31:53 GMT, "Tom" <yahoo@earthlink.com> wrote:
>>
>> There was an Access version for the Mac, but that was YEARS ago before
>> MSFT figured out the market segment for Macs.
>>
>> -Tom.
>
> Hmm, this is pretty grim.
>
>
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Frederick
|
3/21/2008 4:57:49 AM
|
|
Tom van Stiphout <no.spam.tom7744@cox.net> wrote:
>There was an Access version for the Mac, but that was YEARS ago before
>MSFT figured out the market segment for Macs.
No there wasn't. There are references in A97 help to Mac stuff but
that was due to an error when compiling the help text.
Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
Tony's Microsoft Access Blog - http://msmvps.com/blogs/access/
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Tony
|
3/21/2008 10:29:02 PM
|
|
Tom van Stiphout <no.spam.tom7744@cox.net> wrote in
news:cjs4u31rosu5l30aht786vpmqb7e6640nt@4ax.com:
> There was an Access version for the Mac, but that was YEARS ago
> before MSFT figured out the market segment for Macs.
Are you certain about that? I don't think it's actually true. The
Mac-specific points in Access 2's help file applied to data stored
on Mac volumes, I thought.
--
David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/
usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
David
|
3/22/2008 3:30:35 AM
|
|
"Tom" <yahoo@earthlink.com> wrote in
news:zeFEj.4384$jw2.3487@trndny04:
> "Tom van Stiphout" <no.spam.tom7744@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:cjs4u31rosu5l30aht786vpmqb7e6640nt@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:31:53 GMT, "Tom" <yahoo@earthlink.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> There was an Access version for the Mac, but that was YEARS ago
>> before MSFT figured out the market segment for Macs.
>
> Hmm, this is pretty grim.
It's extremely easy with Parallels and other software to run Windows
apps on a Mac these days, since Macs are now Intel-based -- this
means you're not paying nearly as high a price for the emulation
layer. Lots of pros use Macs and run Windows programs on them.
--
David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/
usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
David
|
3/22/2008 3:31:49 AM
|
|
"Tony Toews [MVP]" <ttoews@telusplanet.net> wrote in
news:8kd8u3l598m1up7dtod8a11j4eot36hcu7@4ax.com:
> Tom van Stiphout <no.spam.tom7744@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>There was an Access version for the Mac, but that was YEARS ago
>>before MSFT figured out the market segment for Macs.
>
> No there wasn't. There are references in A97 help to Mac stuff
> but that was due to an error when compiling the help text.
Er, what? How would Mac-specific items get into the source RTFs?
--
David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/
usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
David
|
3/22/2008 3:32:39 AM
|
|
"David W. Fenton" <XXXusenet@dfenton.com.invalid> wrote:
>> No there wasn't. There are references in A97 help to Mac stuff
>> but that was due to an error when compiling the help text.
>
>Er, what? How would Mac-specific items get into the source RTFs?
I don't recall now and I can't find the specific posting in my
archives. And it might've been over a beer. But there was a reason
of some sort. Was it some of the DOS based functions? And the help
there was shared with Mac Office?
Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
Tony's Microsoft Access Blog - http://msmvps.com/blogs/access/
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Tony
|
3/22/2008 4:25:28 AM
|
|
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:25:28 -0600, "Tony Toews [MVP]"
<ttoews@telusplanet.net> wrote:
>"David W. Fenton" <XXXusenet@dfenton.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>>> No there wasn't. There are references in A97 help to Mac stuff
>>> but that was due to an error when compiling the help text.
>>
>>Er, what? How would Mac-specific items get into the source RTFs?
>
>I don't recall now and I can't find the specific posting in my
>archives. And it might've been over a beer. But there was a reason
>of some sort. Was it some of the DOS based functions? And the help
>there was shared with Mac Office?
>
>Tony
Quite a lot of the Help, especially VBA help, was shared across the Office
suite - and Excel and Word did (and do) run on Macs.
--
John W. Vinson [MVP]
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
John
|
3/22/2008 4:58:10 AM
|
|
|
12 Replies
209 Views
(page loaded in 0.261 seconds)
|