Hi,

We recently upgraded an access 97 file to 2002. As a result all our code
required DAO 3.6 to access the database. Our VB application seems to be
reading fine, but our C++ dll is running soooo slowly in comparison. Any
idea what it could be since both pieces of code are both using the same DAO
3.6 library. NOTE: both worked relatively fast in DAO 3.51 in access 97.

Michael

-- 
Message posted via http://www.accessmonster.com

  "Michael Jones via AccessMonster.com" <forum@AccessMonster.com> wrote in
message news:e791a0856e5e4054a616bebc5a048b4b@AccessMonster.com...
  > Hi,
  >
  > We recently upgraded an access 97 file to 2002. As a result all our code
  > required DAO 3.6 to access the database. Our VB application seems to be
  > reading fine, but our C++ dll is running soooo slowly in comparison. Any
  > idea what it could be since both pieces of code are both using the same
DAO
  > 3.6 library. NOTE: both worked relatively fast in DAO 3.51 in access 97.
  >
  > Michael
  >
  > --
  > Message posted via http://www.accessmonster.com

Anyone have ideas about how to resolve this issue. Has anyone encountered
DAO 3.6 to be very slow in C++?

Michael

-- 
Message posted via http://www.accessmonster.com

For speed problems,

http://www.granite.ab.ca/access/performancefaq.htm

is a good place to start (and finish!)

(david)

"Michael Jones via AccessMonster.com" <forum@AccessMonster.com> wrote in 
message news:e791a0856e5e4054a616bebc5a048b4b@AccessMonster.com...
> Hi,
>
> We recently upgraded an access 97 file to 2002. As a result all our code
> required DAO 3.6 to access the database. Our VB application seems to be
> reading fine, but our C++ dll is running soooo slowly in comparison. Any
> idea what it could be since both pieces of code are both using the same 
> DAO
> 3.6 library. NOTE: both worked relatively fast in DAO 3.51 in access 97.
>
> Michael
>
> -- 
> Message posted via http://www.accessmonster.com